This building, World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) was not hit by any aircraft and yet it too imploded like a house of cards, says Korol and his co-authors and others note it housed CIA and Secret Service offices. While the most iconic images of that fateful day are the collapse of the twin towers World Trade Center 1 (WTC 1) and World Trade Center 2 (WTC 2) within moments of each other, following the fires started by a passenger airplane crashing into each of them, there is a third building most often cited as the smoking gun in the “controlled demolition” theory. JEFFMOCK/WIKIMEDIA COMMONS - World Trade Center Building 7 is the red-tinted building behind and to the left of the Twin Towers. “I just couldn’t understand how those buildings collapsed. “I’ve been scratching my head over this one since it happened on Sept. Reached at his home in Dundas, Ont., Korol shrugs off the controversy. Obviously, the content of this article is the responsibility of the authors.” However, given the timing and the importance of the issue, we consider that this feature is sufficiently technical and interesting to merit publication for our readers. The Europhysics News editors also recognize the controversy, publishing the article with the following note: “This feature is somewhat different from our usual purely scientific articles, in that it contains some speculation.
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) over the last 16 years. This has consistently been reaffirmed by U.S. The overwhelming consensus has favoured the official explanation which states that fires burning inside the buildings weakened the structural steel and triggered their collapse.
The group has long been controversial and its arguments have ignited many debates.
#PIGGLY WIGGLY BUSH LA FULL#
Among those petition signatories are 19 who earned their respective degrees in Canada, including 15 who live here.ĪE911 Truth posits: “there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that might have been the actual cause of the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7.” In the controversial paper, the authors reflect the overarching premise of the AE911Truth, which has collected 2,936 signatures from engineers and architects. The report was titled 15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses published last year in the Europhysics News journal which is a magazine for the European physics community and owned by the European Physical Society. Robert Korol, a civil engineering professor emeritus and a fellow of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering, authored a report with Steven Jones, former professor of physics at Brigham Young University, Anthony Szamboti, a mechanical design engineer in the aerospace and communications industries and Ted Walter, director of strategy and development for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth). There is a mountain of evidence (plus common sense and trusting what our eyes saw) to realize that it was a controlled demolition.Įven Trump himself said so the week of the wreckage.ĭespite strong contrary arguments, a McMaster University engineering professor steadfastly maintains the collapse of three World Trade Center buildings after the infamous 9/11 attacks can only be adequately explained if “controlled demolition” is part of the equation. By the way, it’s not the first time allegations of explosions have been made.
0 kommentar(er)
